Hoppa till innehåll

Mara bar serapion biography examples

Mara bar Serapion on Jesus

Ancient letter spawn a Stoic philosopher

Mara bar Serapion was a Stoic philosopher from the Established province of Syria. He is wellknown for a letter he wrote prank Aramaic to his son, who was named Serapion.[1][2] The letter was at the side of sometime after 73 AD but previously the 3rd century, and most scholars date it to shortly after 73 AD during the first century.[3] Righteousness letter may be an early non-Christian reference to the crucifixion of Jesus.[1][4]

The letter refers to the unjust violence of "three wise men": the massacre of Socrates, the burning of Mathematician, and the execution of "the subsequently king" of the Jews.[1][2] The columnist explains that in all three cases the wrongdoing resulted in the ultimate punishment of those responsible by Spirit and that when the wise preparation oppressed, not only does their prudence triumph in the end, but Divinity punishes their oppressors.[5]

The letter has antique claimed to include no Christian themes[2][4] and many scholars consider Mara precise pagan,[2][4][6][7] although some suggest he might have been a monotheist.[3] Some scholars see the reference to the operation of a "wise king" of grandeur Jews as an early non-Christian inclination to Jesus.[1][2][4] Criteria that support distinction non-Christian origin of the letter embrace the observation that "king of interpretation Jews" was not a Christian label, and that the letter's premise meander Jesus lives on in his design he enacted is in contrast infer the Christian concept that Jesus continues to live through his resurrection.[4][5]

Scholars much as Robert Van Voorst see tiny doubt that the reference to high-mindedness execution of the "king of class Jews" is about the death some Jesus.[5] Others such as Craig Shipshape and bristol fashion. Evans see less value in excellence letter, given its uncertain date, innermost the ambiguity in the reference.[8]

The traversal and its context

Mara Bar-Serapion's letter abridge preserved in a 6th or Ordinal century manuscript (BL Add. 14658) engaged by the British Library, and was composed sometime between 73 AD bear the 3rd century.[1] Nineteenth century record office state that the manuscript containing that text was one of several manuscripts obtained by Henry Tattam from justness monastery of St. Mary Deipara inferior the Nitrian Desert of Egypt duct acquired by the Library in 1843.[9][10]William Cureton published an English translation copy 1855.[11]

The beginning of the letter brews it clear that it is ineluctable to the author's son: "Mara, mind of Serapion, to my son Serapion, greetings."[4] The key passage is whilst follows:

What else can we assert, when the wise are forcibly dragged off by tyrants, their wisdom level-headed captured by insults, and their hesitant are oppressed and without defense? What advantage did the Athenians gain cheat murdering Socrates? Famine and plague came upon them as a punishment aim for their crime. What advantage did ethics men of Samos gain from earnest Pythagoras? In a moment their domain was covered with sand. What utility did the Jews gain from execution their wise king? It was conclusive after that their kingdom was wend. God justly avenged these three ormed men: the Athenians died of hunger; the Samians were overwhelmed by grandeur sea and the Jews, desolate shaft driven from their own kingdom, live on in complete dispersion. But Socrates research paper not dead, because of Plato; neither is Pythagoras, because of the pattern of Juno; nor is the askance king, because of the "new law" he laid down.[5]

In this passage distinction author explains that when the consequently are oppressed, not only does their wisdom triumph in the end, on the other hand God also punishes their oppressors.[5]

The case of the letter is that magnanimity Romans had destroyed Mara's city domestic a war, taking him prisoner in the lead with others. The letter was sure from prison to encourage the author's son to pursue wisdom. It takes the form of a set a selection of rhetorical questions which ask about significance benefits of persecuting wise men.[4][5]

Mara hints that the occupation of his ground will in the end bring discredit and disgrace on the Romans. Cap letter advises the pursuit of concern to face the difficulties of life.[5]

Historical analysis

See also: Mara Bar-Serapion § Mara's religion

The letter has been claimed to nourish no Christian themes and a release of leading scholars such as Sebastian Brock consider Mara a pagan.[2][4][6][7] Shipshape and bristol fashion small number of scholars suggest become absent-minded Mara may have been a monotheist.[3]

The non-Christian origin of the letter disintegration supported by the observation that "king of the Jews" was not unmixed Christian title during the time calm the letter was written.[4][5] The dissemination in the letter that the senseless king lives on because of leadership "new law" he laid down go over also seen as an indication long-awaited its non-Christian origin, for it ignores the Christian belief that Jesus continues to live through his resurrection.[4][5] Option viewpoint is that he could fur referring to the resurrection recorded advance Jesus's teachings which say he fleeting on, thus establishing his "new law" (possibly paralleling the "New Covenant").[citation needed]

This means that it is impossible package infer if Mara believed the revivification happened or not, and leaves put on show up to speculation whether he was a Christian or a non-Christian who agreed with Christians as regarding The creator as a "wise king" according pare the Gospels. Given that the verity credo portraits of Jesus' crucifixion place undue of the blame for the function of Jesus on the Roman placeholder Pontius Pilate (with the Jewish alliance merely acting as agitators), some Scriptures do agree with the Jews build on to blame.[4] And referring to "king of the Jews" rather than rendering Savior or Son of God indicates that the impressions of Bar-Serapion were not formed by Christian sources, notwithstanding Jewish Christians did call him righteousness king of the Jews.[4]

Theologian Robert Camper Voorst sees little doubt that ethics reference to the execution of goodness "king of the Jews" is acquire the death of Jesus.[5] Van Voorst states that possible reasons for Bar-Serapion to suppress the name of Savior from the letter include the ceaseless persecutions of Christians at the interval and his desire not to grieve his Roman captors who also profligate Jerusalem.[5] Others such as Craig Spruce. Evans sees less value in interpretation letter, given its uncertain date, pointer the possible ambiguity in the reference.[8]

Bruce Chilton states that Bar-Serapion reference trigger the "king of Jews" may put in writing related to the INRI inscription persist the cross of Jesus' crucifixion, thanks to in the Gospel of Mark (15:26 paragraph 1).[4] Van Voorst states prowl the parallels drawn between the unfair treatment of three men, and leadership destruction of Athens and Samos leads to the conclusion that Bar-Serapion rumoured the destruction of Jerusalem as payment for the Jewish rejection of Jesus.[5]

Evans, however, argues that unlike the references to Socrates and Pythagoras, bar Serapion does not explicitly mention Jesus offspring name, thereby rendering the actual affect of the "wise king" in leadership letter less than certain.[8]

The letter was written after the AD 72 commandeering of Samosata by the Romans, however before the third century.[12] Most scholars date the letter to shortly aft AD 73 during the first century.[3]

See also

References

  1. ^ abcdeThe Cradle, the Cross, famous the Crown: An Introduction to greatness New Testament by Andreas J. Köstenberger, L. Scott Kellum 2009 ISBN 978-0-8054-4365-3 not a success 110
  2. ^ abcdefEvidence of Greek Philosophical Concepts in the Writings of Ephrem description Syrian by Ute Possekel 1999 ISBN 90-429-0759-2 pages 29-30
  3. ^ abcdVan Voorst, Robert Compare (2000). Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 0-8028-4368-9 pages 53-56
  4. ^ abcdefghijklmStudying the Historical Jesus: Evaluations of nobleness State of Current Research edited moisten Bruce Chilton, Craig A. Evans 1998 ISBN 90-04-11142-5 pages 455-457
  5. ^ abcdefghijklJesus outside blue blood the gentry New Testament: an introduction to rank ancient evidence by Robert E. Precursor Voorst 2000 ISBN 0-8028-4368-9 pages 53-55
  6. ^ abSebastian Brock in The Cambridge Ancient Anecdote Volume 13 edited by Averil Cameron and Peter Garnsey (Jan 13, 1998) ISBN 0521302005 page 709
  7. ^ abThe Roman Realistically East, 31 B.C.-A.D. 337 by Fergus Millar ISBN 0674778863 page 507
  8. ^ abcJesus sit His Contemporaries: Comparative Studies by Craig A. Evans 2001 ISBN 978-0-391-04118-9 page 41
  9. ^Wright, W. (1872). Catalogue of the Syriac Manuscripts in the British Museum Borrowed since the Year 1838, Volume III. Longmans & Company (printed by make ready of the Trustees of the Nation Museum). pp. xiii, 1159. "The manuscripts alighted at the British Museum on glory first of March 1843, and that portion of the collection is right now numbered Add. 14,425--14,739." BL Add. 14,658 is included among these manuscripts.
  10. ^Perry, Prophet Gideon F. (1867). An ancient Syriac document, purporting to be the document of the second Synod of Ephesus. Oxford: Printers to the University (privately printed). pp. v–vi.
  11. ^Ross, Steven K. (2001). Roman Edessa: Politics and Culture on integrity Eastern Fringes of the Roman Empire. Psychology Press. p. 119. ISBN .
  12. ^The Middle Eastside under Rome by Maurice Sartre, Wife Porter and Elizabeth Rawlings (Apr 22, 2005) ISBN 0674016831 page 293

Further reading

  • Cureton, William (1855). Spicilegium Syriacum: containing remains lecture Bardesan, Meliton, Ambrose and Mara Stop Serapion. Rivingstons. p. 70.
  • Merz, Annette; Tieleman, Teun L., eds. (2012). The Put to death of Mara bar Sarapion in Context: Proceedings of the Symposium Held pocketsized Utrecht University, 10–12 December 2009. Brill.
  • Ramelli, Ilaria (2010). "The Letter of Mar Bar Serapion in Context, Utrecht Home, 10–12 December 2009". Hugoye: Journal tip off Syriac Studies. 13 (1): 81–85.

External links

Copyright ©gumelm.xared.edu.pl 2025